JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 15, 2005Full bench

C-115 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Hernan Dario Orozco Lopez

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada En Norma Del Codigo Nacional De Policia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Integración Comité Clasificación Películas
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Decreto 1355 de 1970 articulo 152 (parcial).

"se dictan normas sobre policia" modificado por el articulo 2 del decreto 2055 de 1970 "por el cual se adiciona y modifican algunas disposiciones del decreto-ley 1355 de 1970".comité de clasificacion de películas integrado por un representante de la curia arquidiocesana de bogota.

Existencia de cosa juzgada constitucional.

Como quiera que el fragmento demandado ya fue estudiado por esta corporacion y declarado inexequible existe sobre la materia cosa juzgada constitucional.

Estese a lo resuleto en la sentencia c-1175/04

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1355/70. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 152Decreto 1355/70ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-1175 de 2004, en la cual se declaro inexequible la expresion "y un representante de la curia Arquidiocesana de Bogota" contenida en el articulo 152 del Codigo Nacional de Policia (Decreto 1355 de 1970, modificado por el articulo 2 del Decreto 2055 de 1970).
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
ConcurrenceRodrigo Escobar GilConcurrenceMarco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.