JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)September 26, 2001Full bench

C-1027 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Carlos Humberto Perez Vezga

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional En Prohibición De Transferencias Y Liquidación De Empresas Ineficientes
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Prohibición de transferencias y liquidación de empresas ineficientes
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 617 de 2000.

Art. 14.

Descentralizacion.

Racionalizacion del gasto publico nacional.

Saneamiento fiscal de las entidades territoriales.

Prohibicion de transferencias y liquidacion de empresas ineficientes.

Creditos directos o indirectos.

Autonomia de

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1421/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionDecreto 1421/93ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 14Ley 617/00ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-540 de 22 de mayo de 2001 en cuanto declaró la INEXEQUIBILIDAD de la expresión:"a las Empresas Prestadoras de Servicios de Salud"contenida en el artículo 14 de la Ley 617 de 2000.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.