A- de 2022
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
✓Claimant Natalia Bernal Cano
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por carencia actual de objeto, por vencimiento periodo de Magistrado recusado
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recusación presentada contra la magistrada Gloria Stella Ortiz, en el marco de la solicitud de nulidad de los Autos 473/20 y 549/22.
Teniendo en cuenta que la magistrada recusada cumplió su período constitucional el 2 de julio de 2022, concluyó la Corte que se produce una carencia actúa de objeto en los reclamos de la peticionaria.
Acorde con lo anterior, la Sala Plena decidió RECHAZAR la mencionada recusación.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR la recusación formulada por la ciudadana Natalia Bernal Cano en contra de la magistrada Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado para resolver las solicitudes de nulidad contra los autos 473 de 2020 y 549 de 2022 por las razones de esta providencia.
- SEGUNDO. ADVERTIR a la peticionaria que contra esta providencia no proceden recursos.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.