JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 30, 2022

A- de 2022

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Diana Constanza Fajardo Rivera

✓Claimant Cleaner Sa

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia jurisdiccional y no consultiva para aclarar el contenido de sus fallos
Solicitud De Aclaracion Sentencia De Constitucionalidad
  • Rechazar por cuanto se pretende que la Corte resuelva consulta
Solicitud De Aclaracion Y Adicion De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se resuelve una consulta sobre el cumplimiento de la Sentencia T-104/22, formulada por el representante legal de Cleaner SA, específicamente sobre el numeral segundo de su parte resolutiva, relacionada con la orden de reubicación.

Luego de verificar que lo pretendido, en el sentido en que se formuló, esto es, como consulta de cumplimiento, es una figura ajena los trámites de tutela, la Corte decidió RECHAZARLA, por improcedente.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR la consulta para cumplimiento de la Sentencia T-104 de 2022 presentada por Cleaner S.A. a través de su representante legal.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por intermedio de la Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional COMUNICAR la presente providencia a la peticionaria e informarle que contra esta decisión no procede recurso alguno.
  3. TERCERO. Por Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional COMUNICAR la presente providencia al Juzgado 36 Civil Municipal de Bogotá D.C.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Diana Constanza Fajardo Rivera
Reporting justice
✓
Alejandro Linares Cantillo
Magistrado
✓
Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.