A- de 2024
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar
✓Claimant Tous Crismatt Miguel Enrique Y Otro·Respondent --
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Finalidad
- Características
- Incumplimiento de la carga argumentativa
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica.
La demanda se rechazó porque los accionantes no la subsanaron en debida forma.
Consideró la Sala Plena de la Corporación que el recurso deprecado no acreditó la carga de motivación necesaria para adelantar un análisis de fondo y, por ello, decidió RECHAZARLO.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR, por falta de carga argumentativa, el recurso de súplica presentado por los ciudadanos Miguel Enrique Tous Crismatt y Javier Gastelbondo Campo, en contra del Auto del 15 de abril de 2024 que rechazó la demanda presentada dentro del expediente D-15.697.
- Segundo. Por intermedio de la Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional,
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.