JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 17, 2025

A- de 2025

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar

✓Claimant Alejandro Aristizabal Zapata·Respondent --

✓
Topic · hard data
Sin Información
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recusacion De Magistrado En Proceso De Constitucionalidad
  • Rechazar de plano por falta de competencia, por cuanto Magistrado no se ha posesionado en el cargo
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recusación presentada en contra del magistrado electo Héctor Alfonso Carvajal Londoño.

Según el memorialista, el precitado magistrado incurrió en varias de las causales contenidas en el artículo 25 del Decreto 2067 de 1991, lo que podría soslayar su independencia e imparcialidad judicial para participar en la decisión sobre la constitucionalidad de la ley demandada.

Al revisar el asunto concluyó la Sala Plena que la Corte Constitucional no tiene competencia para estudiar la pertinencia de una recusación presentada contra un magistrado electo que no se ha posesionado en el cargo.

Con base en lo anterior, se RECHAZÓ DE PLANO, por falta de competencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR DE PLANO, por falta de competencia, la recusación presentada por Alejandro Aristizábal Zapata, dentro del proceso D-15.989, en contra del magistrado electo de la Corte Constitucional Héctor Alfonso Carvajal Londoño.
  2. SEGUNDO. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar
Reporting justice
✓
Carolina Ramírez Pérez
Magistrado
✓
José Fernando Reyes Cuartas
Magistrado
✓
Juan Carlos Cortés González
Magistrado
✓
Lina Marcela Escobar Martínez
Magistrado
✓
Miguel Efrain Polo Rosero
Magistrado
✓
Natalia Ángel Cabo
Magistrado
✓
Paola Andrea Meneses Mosquera
Magistrado
✓
Vladimir Fernández Andrade
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.