JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 8, 2024

A- de 2024

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Fernando Reyes Cuartas

✓Claimant Edilberto Daza Bejarano

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De Constitucionalidad
  • Rechazar por incumplir requisito de oportunidad
  • Requisitos
Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Presupuestos formales y materiales de procedencia
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia C-021/23.

El actor adujo que en el precitado fallo la Corte incurrió en un cambio ilegitimo de jurisprudencia y por esa vía, en una elusión arbitraria del análisis de asuntos de relevancia constitucional.

La Sala Plena verificó que la presente petición incumple el requisito de oportunidad, en tanto fue presentada de manera extemporánea.

Con base en lo anterior, se RECHAZÓ la nulidad invocada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por extemporánea la solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia C-021 de 2023 presentada por el ciudadano Edilberto Daza Bejarano.
  2. Segundo. INFORMAR al peticionario que contra el presente auto no procede recurso alguno.
  3. Tercero. Por intermedio de la Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional, COMUNICAR la presente providencia al peticionario.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.