A- de 2018
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo
✓Claimant Victoria Eugenia Ramos Ordoñez Y Otros
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Cuando se alega la interpretación de una norma se debe cumplir con una mayor carga argumentativa
- Se confirma en su integridad el auto recurrido
- Incumplimiento de requisitos de especificidad y certeza
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica.
El rechazo de la demanda se dio porque el actor no logró subsanar las carencias identificadas en el auto de inadmisión.
Como quiera que la Sala Plena consideró que el demandante se limitó a reiterar los argumentos consignados en la demanda y en el escrito de corrección, decidió CONFIRMAR la providencia recurrida.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- RESUELVE
- CONFIRMAR el auto del 19 de noviembre de 2018, dictado por el Magistrado Sustanciador Alejandro Linares Cantillo, por medio del cual rechazo la demanda, identificada con el numero de radicacion D-12940.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.