JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 21, 2021

A- de 2021

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo

✓Claimant Harold Eduardo Sua Montaño

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Sentencia De Constitucionalidad
  • Procedencia excepcional por violación al debido proceso
Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De Constitucionalidad
  • Rechazar por falta de carga argumentativa
Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Requisitos formales y materiales de procedencia
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad y aclaración de la Sentencia C-119/21.

La Corte decidió RECHAZAR las precitadas pretensiones, en tanto encontró que, en relación con la primera, no se acreditó el deber de argumentación que se exige y, respecto a la segunda, se incumplió una exigencia básica de argumentación relacionada con la falta de claridad o la ambigüedad de la parte resolutiva del fallo de la referencia, objeto específico de la solicitud de aclaración.

Se ordena al peticionario que, en lo sucesivo se abstenga de formular peticiones manifiestamente improcedentes.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR la solicitud de nulidad y aclaracion de la Sentencia C-119 de 2021, formulada por el ciudadano Harold Eduardo Sua Montana.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR al ciudadano Harold Eduardo Sua Montana que, en lo sucesivo, se abstenga de formular peticiones manifiestamente improcedentes.
  3. Tercero. Contra esta providencia no proceden recursos.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.