JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 19, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio Piñeros Perdomo

✓Claimant Grety Patricila Lopez Alban Y Otro·Respondent Estatuto Tributario Art. 336 Y 388 Parciales

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Impedimentos Y Recusaciones De Magistrados Y Conjueces De La Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia de la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional
Regimen De Impedimentos Y Recusaciones De Magistrados Y Conjueces De La Corte Constitucional
  • Aplicación
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional, conformada para este asunto por conjueces, decidió ACEPTAR el impedimento manifestado por el doctor Rodrigo Uprimny Yepes para intervenir y decidir sobre la demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra los artículos 336 y 338 (parciales) del Estatuto Tributario, en el marco del proceso correspondiente al Expediente D-12814.

Así mismo, dispuso RECHAZAR el impedimento formulado por los conjueces William Zambrano Cetina y Jorge Pinzón Sánchez, por no existir un claro y directo compromiso de su objetividad y neutralidad.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. ACEPTAR el impedimento manifestado por el conjuez Rodrigo Uprimny para intervenir y decidir sobre la demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra los articulos 336 (parcial) y 338 (parcial) del Estatuto Tributario, en el marco del proceso correspondiente al Expediente D-12814.
  2. RECHAZAR el impedimento manifestado por los conjueces William Zabrano Cetina y Jorge Pinzon Sanchez por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Mauricio Piñeros Perdomo
Reporting justice
✓
Catalina Botero Marino
Presidente
✓
Juan Carlos Henao Pérez
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.