JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 13, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Corine Duffis Stell Y Otros

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recursos de súplica interpuestos en contra de los autos que rechazaron la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia.

Un primer recurso se formuló respecto del rechazo in limine por falta de competencia y, el segundo, por el derivado de la falta de subsanación de acuerdo a los lineamiento presentados en la inadmisión.

Por coincidir con los argumentos planteados por el Magistrado Ponente, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decide CONFIRMAR los autos recurridos.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR los autos del 27 de octubre de 2017 y del 22 de noviembre del mismo ano, proferidos por el Magistrado Antonio Jose Lizarazo Ocampo, que rechazaron la demanda presentada por los ciudadanos Corine Duffis Steel, Walt Hayes y Sergio Estrada Alvarez.
  2. SEGUNDO. A traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte, comuniquese el contenido de esta decision al recurrente, indicandole que contra esta no procede recurso alguno.
  3. TERCERO. Archivese el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.