JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 26, 2022

A- de 2022

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Fernando Reyes Cuartas

✓Claimant Jaime Plata Ramos

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica
  • Procede únicamente respecto del auto que rechaza la admisión de la demanda de inconstitucionalidad
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente proveído se RECHAZA por improcedente el escrito presentado en contra del Auto 274/22, por medio del cual la Sala Plena de la Corporación resolvió el recuso de súplica contra la providencia que rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra el Decreto Ley 3541 de 1983.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente el escrito presentado por el ciudadano Jaime Plata Ramos contra el Auto 274 de 2022 por el cual la Sala Plena resolvió el recurso de súplica contra el Auto del 8 de febrero de 2022 que rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra el Decreto Ley 3541 de 1983.
  2. Segundo. Proceda la Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional a comunicar el contenido de esta decisión al recurrente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.