JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 10, 2024

A- de 2024

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Fernando Reyes Cuartas

✓Claimant Luis Hernando Rodriguez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad del auto que negó la solicitud de cumplimiento de la Sentencia T-022/18.

El peticionario argumentó que la precitada providencia desconoció el principio de cosa juzgada y vulneró los derechos al debido proceso, al acceso a la administración de justicia, a la igualdad, a la dignidad humana, a la seguridad social y al mínimo vital.

Tras verificar que el requerimiento objeto de estudio no cumplió con el requisito de oportunidad en tanto fue presentado de manera evidentemente extemporánea, la Corte decidió RECHAZAR la nulidad invocada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Rechazar por extemporánea la solicitud de nulidad presentada por el ciudadano Luis Hernando Rodríguez contra el Auto del 7 de noviembre de 2023, mediante el cual se resolvió la solicitud de cumplimiento de la Sentencia T-022 de 2018.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.