JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 23, 2021

A- de 2021

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Fernando Reyes Cuartas

✓Claimant Carlos Manuel Rodriguez Santos

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica.

La demanda fue rechazada por la indebida subsanación.

Esto, por cuanto en el escrito de corrección el actor insistió en las razones invocadas en su memorial inicial, sin rectificar los aspectos de la demanda que debían ser complementados, de acuerdo al auto de inadmisión.

Luego de encontrar que el actor no cumplió con la carga argumentativa necesaria para hacer procedente el recurso, en tanto la motivación no estaba encaminada a controvertir las consideraciones que condujeron al despacho sustanciador a rechazar la demanda, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió RECHAZARLO.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR el recurso de suplica interpuesto por el ciudadano Carlos Manuel Rodriguez Santos contra el Auto del 27 de agosto de 2021 por medio del cual se rechazo la demanda correspondiente al expediente D-14364.
  2. Segundo. Proceda la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional a comunicar el contenido de esta decision a los recurrentes.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.