JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 10, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos

✓Claimant Cabildo Mayor Regional Del Resguardo Indigena Del Zenu

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Improcedencia por falta de carga argumentativa
  • Requisitos formales y materiales de procedencia
  • Negar por cuanto cargos planteados son infundados y se pretende reabrir debate jurídico
1 topic · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-103/18, formulada por el Cabildo Mayor Regional del Resguardo Indígena del Zenú de San Andrés de Sotavento-Córdoba y Sucre.

Los argumentos de la petición fueron la violación al debido proceso por la omisión de estudio de asuntos de relevancia constitucional, el desconocimiento del precedente fijado en la providencia de unificación SU.097/17 y el conocimiento de hechos posteriores a la expedición del fallo, relacionados con la existencia de un presunto complot para liquidar a la E.P.S.I.

MANEXKA.

Por no cumplir con los requisitos de procedencia, se RECHAZA la nulidad invocada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR la solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-103 de 2018, formulada por el apoderado del Cabildo Mayor Regional del Resguardo Indigena Zenu de San Andres de Sotavento de Cordoba y Sucre, en los terminos de la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  2. Segundo. COMUNIQUESE la presente providencia a la peticionaria, con la advertencia que contra esta decision no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Alberto Rojas Ríos
Reporting justice
✓
Alejandro Linares Cantillo
Presidente
✓
Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo
Magistrado
✓
Carlos Libardo Bernal Pulido
Magistrado
✓
Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
Magistrado
✓
Diana Constanza Fajardo Rivera
Magistrado
✓
Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Magistrado
✓
José Fernando Reyes Cuartas
Magistrado
✓
Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.