A- de 2023
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Diana Constanza Fajardo Rivera
✓Claimant Forero Bolívar Miguel Andrés·Respondent --
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Incumplimiento de la carga argumentativa
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica: La demanda se rechazó porque el actor no la corrigió en los términos indicados en el auto inadmisorio.
Por no cumplir con la carga argumentativa mínima para realizar un estudio de fondo, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió RECHAZAR el recurso impetrado.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por improcedente el recurso de súplica presentado contra el Auto del 21 de marzo de 2023, proferido por el magistrado Juan Carlos Cortés González dentro del expediente D-15101, el cual rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad del ciudadano Miguel Andrés Forero Bolívar contra el numeral D.12 del artículo 21 de la Ley 1383 de 2010.
- SEGUNDO. A través de la Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional, COMUNICAR el contenido de esta decisión al demandante, indicándole que contra esta no procede recurso alguno.
- TERCERO. Ejecutoriada esta decisión, ARCHIVAR el expediente D-15101.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.