JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 22, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Icbf

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Negar por cuanto la parte resolutiva no ofrece ninguna duda alegada por el accionante
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia T-582/17.

La Jefe de la Oficina Asesora Jurídica del ICBF pidió a la Sala de Revisión aclarar si la orden estipulada en la parte resolutiva de la providencia de la referencia se refiere a la realización de un simple diálogo directo con las Comunidades Negras y Afrodescendientes del Municipio de San Jacinto, o si por el contrario conlleva el deber de adelantar el proceso de consulta previa.

Por considerar que el fallo aludido no hace referencia a elementos jurídicos vagos o ambiguos sino a un derecho fundamental con un contenido concreto y definido, se DENIEGA la aclaración invocada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto la Sala Quinta de Revision de Tutelas de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. NEGAR la solicitud de aclaracion de la Sentencia T-582 de 2017, presentada por Luz Karime Fernandez Castillo, Jefe de la Oficina Asesora Juridica del Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.