A- de 2017
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos
✓Claimant Jean M. Hunsberger
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Requisitos formales y materiales de procedencia
- Rechazar por extemporánea
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-627/12.
El memorialista argumenta que la providencia de la referencia debe declararse nula, porque su carácter antijurídico y violatorio de la división de poderes y el Estado de Derecho la convierte en atentados contra la democracia y afectan gravemente la legitimidad del Tribunal que la Carta del 91 creó para defender el orden constitucional, no para suplantarlo.
Teniendo en cuenta que el incidente se formuló por fuera del término previsto para tal efecto, la Corte decide RECHAZARLO por extemporáneo.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por extemporaneo el incidente de nulidad propuesto por el senor JEAN M. HUNSBERGER, contra la Sentencia T-627 de 2012, dictada por la Sala Octava de Revision de la Corte Constitucional.
- SEGUNDO. ADVERTIR al incidentante que contra la presente decision no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.