JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 8, 2021

A- de 2021

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Fernando Reyes Cuartas

✓Claimant Apoderado General Motors Colmotores

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Adicion De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Requisitos de procedencia excepcional
Solicitud De Adicion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Rechazar por improcedente
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de adición de la Sentencia T-237/21.

El apoderado judicial de la empresa General Motors Colmotores le pidió a la Corporación adicionar el fallo de la referencia, en el sentido de consignar en la parte resolutiva la facultad que le asiste a la compañía de compensar algunos emolumentos ordenados, a partir de los valores cancelados a los trabajadores al momento de finalizar el contrato laboral.

La Sala Plena decidió RECHAZAR la petición de adición formulada, por incumplir el requisito de carga argumentativa, lo que deviene en la imposibilidad de analizar el fondo del asunto planteado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR la solicitud de adicion de la sentencia T-237 de 2021, interpuesta por el apoderado judicial de General Motors Colmotores, de conformidad con las razones expuestas en esta decision.
  2. Segundo. Proceda la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion a librar las comunicaciones correspondientes acompanando copia integral de este proveido.
  3. Tercero. Contra el presente auto no procede ningun recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
José Fernando Reyes Cuartas
Reporting justice
✓
Alberto Rojas Ríos
Magistrado
✓
Diana Constanza Fajardo Rivera
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.