JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 2, 2021

A- de 2021

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo

✓Claimant Jorge Luis Pabon Apicella

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica.

La demanda se rechazó porque fue presentada de manera extemporánea y, en tal sentido, la acción de inconstitucionalidad se encontraba caduca y la Corte resultaba manifiestamente incompetente para conocerla.

Lo anterior, en razón a que trascurrieron más de tres años desde la promulgación del acto legislativo en el que se insertaron las normas cuestionadas en esta oportunidad.

Con base en lo anterior la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió CONFIRMAR el auto cuestionado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el Auto de 9 de agosto de 2021 proferido por el magistrado sustanciador Alejandro Linares Cantillo, mediante el cual rechazo la demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra el numeral 3 (parcial) del articulo 3 del Acto Legislativo 01 de 2018, "por medio del cual se modifican los articulos 186, 234, 235 de la Constitucion Politica y se implementa el derecho a la doble instancia y a impugnar la primera instancia condenatoria", radicada con el numero D-14361.
  2. SEGUNDO. A traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte, COMUNICAR el contenido de la decision al recurrente, indicandole que contra esta no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.