JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 13, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez

✓Claimant Carlos Alberto Villareal Acuña Y Otros

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Rechaza Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Incompetencia de la Corte Constitucional para conocer demanda contra decreto reglamentario
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica contra el Auto que rechazó de plano la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia, por cuanto las disposiciones acusadas se encuentran incluidas en un decreto de naturaleza reglamentaria, respecto del cual la Corporación es manifiestamente incompetente para adelantar su examen de constitucionalidad, en los términos previstos en el artículo 241 del Texto Superior.

La Sala Plena compartió plenamente los argumentos de la Magistrada Sustanciadora y, en tal sentido, decidió CONFIRMAR en su integridad el auto recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de esta Corporacion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. CONFIRMAR en su integridad el Auto del dieciseis (16) de noviembre de 2016, proferido por la Magistrada Sustanciadora Maria Victoria Calle Correa, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda interpuesta por los ciudadanos Carlos Alberto Villareal Acuna, Carlos Arturo Rua Zapata y Gabriel Lopez Vasquez, radicada bajo numero D-11766.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.