A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Aquiles Arrieta Gómez
✓Claimant Iris Lizzette Buitrago Almanaza
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia por cuanto la solicitud se presentó después de realizado el reparto de los expedientes
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se solicitó a la Corporación acumular la demanda de inconstitucionalidad D-11494 a la radicada con el número D-11275.
Lo anterior, por existir coincidencia total de las normas acusadas de la Ley 1776 de 2015.
La Sala Plena reitera que la acumulación de procesos sólo procede cuando su solicitud es formulada en el momento del reparto de los expedientes puestos a su consideración y, en consecuencia, decide NEGAR la petición formulada.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
- RESUELVE
- Primero. NEGAR la solicitud de acumulacion del proceso D-11275 y D-11276, realizada por la ciudadana IRIS LIZZETTE BUITRAGO ALMANZA.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.