JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 5, 2019

A- de 2019

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Fernando Reyes Cuartas

✓Claimant Personeria De Bogota

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • No se desconoció precedente jurisprudencial
Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De Revision De Tutela
  • Cumplimiento de requisitos de legitimidad, oportunidad y suficiente carga argumentativa
Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Presupuestos materiales de procedencia
  • Negar por cuanto cargos planteados son infundados y se pretende reabrir debate jurídico
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Incidente de nulidad de la Sentencia T-322/19, formulada por la Personera de Bogotá y coadyuvada por la Jefe de la Oficina Jurídica de la misma entidad.

Las causales de nulidad invocadas fueron el desconocimiento del precedente y la omisión de análisis de asuntos de relevancia constitucional.

Teniendo en cuenta que los argumentos que soportan la solicitud no cumplen con el requisito de la carga argumentativa requerida para este tipo de incidentes, la Corte decidió RECHAZARLO.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR la solicitud de nulidad presentada por Carmen Teresa Castaneda Villamizar, personera de Bogota -coadyuvaba por la oficina juridica de dicha entidad-, contra la sentencia T-322 de 2019, por incumplimiento del requisito de carga argumentativa.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
José Fernando Reyes Cuartas
Reporting justice
Read concurrence
✓
Alberto Rojas Ríos
Magistrado
✓
Alejandro Linares Cantillo
Magistrado
✓
Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo
Magistrado
Read concurrence
✓
Carlos Libardo Bernal Pulido
Magistrado
✓
Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
Magistrado
✓
Diana Constanza Fajardo Rivera
Magistrado
✓
Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Presidente
Read concurrence
✓
Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
Magistrado
Separate opinions — text available3
ConcurrenceGloria Stella Ortiz DelgadoConcurrenceAntonio José Lizarazo OcampoConcurrenceJosé Fernando Reyes Cuartas
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.