A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos
✓Claimant Cristiian Albert Uscategui Sanchez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por no sustentar la solicitud en una razón objetiva de duda que dificulte el entendimiento de la providencia judicial o que conduzca a la ambigüedad de la parte resolutiva de la misma
- Procedencia excepcional
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia C-497/16.
Revisada la petición formulada por el demandante considera la Corte que la misma versa sobre una interpretación aislada de la sentencia y no corresponde a una ambigüedad derivada de la misma.
Con base en lo anterior, se RECHAZA, por improcedente, la aclaración invocada.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de aclaracion de la Sentencia C-497 de 2016, presentada por Cristian Albert Uscategui Sanchez.
- SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR la presente providencia al peticionario, con la advertencia que contra esta decision no procede ningun recurso.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.