A- de 2022
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
✓Claimant Angela Maria Robledo Gomez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Negar por falta de carga argumentativa
- Negar por cuanto cargos planteados son infundados y se pretende reabrir debate jurídico
- Presupuestos formales y materiales de procedencia
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia SU.209/21.
La peticionaria presentó como cargos los siguientes: i) la elusión arbitraria del análisis de asuntos de relevancia constitucional y ii) el desconocimiento de la cosa juzgada constitucional.
Por no cumplir con la carga argumentativa exigida para dar trámite a este tipo de pretensiones, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió RECHAZARLA.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR la solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia SU-209 de 2021, presentada por Ángela María Robledo Gómez, por las consideraciones expuestas en el presente auto.
- SEGUNDO. Comuníquese la presente providencia a la solicitante, con la advertencia de que contra esta decisión no procede ningún recurso.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.