A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos
✓Claimant Floresmiro Suarez Leon Y Otros
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por extemporáneo
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto contra el auto que rechazó las demandas de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia, por haber operado el fenómeno de la cosa juzgada en tanto la Corporación en Sentencia C-250/12 estudió si las expresiones contenidas en los artículos ahora acusados afectaban el derecho a la igualdad.
La Sala Plena decidió RECHAZAR, por extemporáneos, los recursos sometidos a su consideración.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por extemporaneos los recursos de suplica interpuestos por los ciudadanos Floresmiro Suarez Leon, Esiquio Silva Pedraza y Astrid Yaneth Ramirez Cano, contra expresiones del articulo 3deg (parcial) y 75 (parcial) de la Ley 1448 de 2011, correspondientes al expediente numero D-11722.
- SEGUNDO. COMUNIQUESE la presente providencia a los recurrentes, informandoles que contra esta decision no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.