JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 10, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa

✓Claimant Ministro De Hacienda Y Credito Publico

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Reposicion Contra Auto Que Declaro Inadmisible Incidente De Impacto Fiscal
  • Causales de inadmisión
  • Oportunidad y legitimidad en la presentación del recurso
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de reposición contra el auto 531/15, mediante el cual se declaró inadmisible el incidente de impacto fiscal presentado por el Ministro de Hacienda y Crédito Público, respecto de la sentencia C-492/15.

Luego de analizar detalladamente la impugnación presentada por el jefe de la Cartera Ministerial, la Corte Constitucional decide NEGARLA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NEGAR el recurso de reposición instaurado por el Ministro de Hacienda y Crédito Público contra el auto 531 de 2015.
  2. Segundo. Contra el presente auto no procede recurso alguno. Sin embargo, al solicitante aún le queda el término de cinco días para corregir la sustentación del incidente de impacto fiscal, contados desde la notificación del presente auto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.