JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 3, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub

✓Claimant Luis Fernando Botero Y Otro

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Requisitos formales y materiales de procedencia
  • Improcedencia por falta de carga argumentativa
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitudes de nulidad de la sentencia T-384/14.

Los peticionarios argumentaron que el fallo cuestionado vulnera los derechos al debido proceso, acceso a la justicia e igualdad ante la ley: Igualmente, que controvierte jurisprudencia unificada de la Corporación y del propio magistrado ponente, respecto al límite de pensiones que consagra la ley.

La Sala Plena consideró que la petición no explica de forma clara y expresa los preceptos constitucionales trasgredidos, ni la incidencia en la decisión proferida, como tampoco demuestra las irregularidades que vulneran el debido proceso.

Tras concluir que el escrito de nulidad carece de carga argumentativa, se DENIEGA la petición formulada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. DENEGAR la solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-384 de 2014 presentada por el senor Luis Fernando Botero Henao, Representante Legal de la Sociedad Consorcio Nacional de Ingenieros Contratistas CONIC S.A.
  2. SEGUNDO. DENEGAR la solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-384 de 2014 presentada por el senor Milton Romero Baquero.
  3. TERCERO. Contra este pronunciamiento no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub
Reporting justice
✓
Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo
Concurring opinion
Read concurrence
✓
Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva
Concurring opinion
✓
María Victoria Calle Correa
Concurring opinion
Read concurrence
✓
Alberto Rojas Ríos
Magistrado
✓
Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Magistrado
✓
Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio
Magistrado
✓
Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
Magistrado
✓
Myriam Avila Roldán
Magistrado
Separate opinions — text available2
ConcurrenceGabriel Eduardo Mendoza MarteloConcurrenceMaría Victoria Calle Correa
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.