A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
✓Claimant Marco Fidel Ramirez Antonio
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Condiciones formales y materiales
- Rechazar por impertinente
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recusación contra la Magistrada María Victoria Calle Correa.
El memorialista adujo que las declaraciones hechas por la magistrada a los medios de comunicación podían ser entendidas como una conceptualización sobre la pregunta del plebiscito, que justamente constituía el objeto de la acción de constitucionalidad analizada en el proceso.
La Sala Plena de la Corporación decide RECHAZAR, por falta de pertinencia, la recusación formulada.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por falta de pertinencia la recusacion presentada por el ciudadano Marco Fidel Ramirez Antonio contra la magistrada Maria Victoria Calle Correa, dentro del expediente D-11675.
- SEGUNDO. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.