JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 25, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓Claimant Jaime Raul Alvarado Pacheco

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Se accede a la solicitud de aclaración con la finalidad de evitar equívocos en el cumplimiento del fallo
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la sentencia T-655/15.

Con el presente auto se aclara el numeral 2.2. de la parte motiva de la sentencia de la referencia, en el sentido de indicar el nombre correcto de la autoridad judicial que profirió el fallo cuestionado en la respectiva acción de tutela.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Octava de Revision
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Aclarar el numeral 2.2 de la parte motiva de la sentencia T-655 de 2015, en el sentido que, quien dicto el fallo cuestionado mediante la accion de tutela, no fue Jaime Raul Alvarado Pacheco, sino el funcionario Rodrigo Rodriguez Barragan, titular en ese momento del Juzgado Unico Penal del Circuito Especializado de Arauca.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.