A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Aquiles Arrieta Gómez
✓Claimant Edgar Eduardo Acero Acosta
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Se confirma rechazo por falta de corrección
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica contra el auto que rechazó la demanda de la referencia, por cuanto el término de ejecutoria para corregirla venció en silencio.
La Sala Plena de la Corporación corroboró que el demandante no presentó su escrito de subsanación dentro del término establecido y decidió CONFIRMAR el auto recurrido.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. CONFIRMAR el Auto del cuatro (04) de octubre de dos mil dieciseis (2016), proferido por el despacho del Magistrado Ponente en el proceso D-11647, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Edgar Eduardo Acero Acosta en contra del numeral 5o del articulo 147 de la Ley 65 de 1993.
- Segundo. ARCHIVESE el expediente.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.