JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 7, 2022

A- de 2022

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Direccion De Personal De Las Fuerzas Militares

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Rechazar por cuanto órdenes impartidas no generan una duda objetiva y razonable sobre el alcance de la medida que allí se tomó
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia T-392/21, formulada por la Dirección de Personal de las Fuerzas Militares.

Luego de analizar los argumentos de la peticionaria concluyó la Corte que no existen conceptos o frases que generen duda sobre el alcance del fallo mencionado y que lo que se pretende es reabrir el debate culminado.

Al encontrar que la providencia no es ambigua se RECHAZÓ la aclaración rogada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (10 points)
  1. Primero. NEGAR la solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia T-392 de 2021, presentada por el Coronel William Alfonso Chávez Vargas, en su calidad de Director de Personal del Ejército Nacional, Fuerzas Militares de Colombia, el 24 de febrero de 2022.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso.
  3. Comuníquese y cúmplase,
  4. GLORIA STELLA ORTÍZ DELGADO
  5. Magistrada
  6. CRISTINA PARDO SCHLESINGER
  7. Presidenta
  8. JOSÉ FERNANDO REYES CUARTAS
  9. Magistrado
  10. MARTHA VICTORIA SÁCHICHA MÉNDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Reporting justice
✓
Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
Presidente
✓
José Fernando Reyes Cuartas
Magistrado
Read dissent
Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJosé Fernando Reyes Cuartas
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 0cited by 1 →A. 540/22T-563/23 — Derecho A La Calificación De La Pérdida De Capacidad Laboral, Seguridad Social, Mínimo Vital Y Dignidad Humana-Pago De Incapacidades (540 Dí · cited 2 timesT-563/232023
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by1

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.