JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 1, 2019

A- de 2019

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Fernando Reyes Cuartas

✓Claimant Luis Antonio Garzon Moreno

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Procesal En La Accion De Tutela
  • Puede presentarse antes y después del fallo proferido por la Corte Constitucional
  • Concepto
Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Improcedencia por falta de carga argumentativa
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-353/19.

El peticionario, un ciudadano vinculado al trámite de la tutela, solicitó a la Corte declarar de plano la nulidad de la acción de revisión y declarar improcedente la solicitud de amparo.

Considera la Sala que el interesado no pretende la nulidad del fallo proferido por la Corporación, sino que reprocha el trámite de revisión adelantado por la misma.

Por no acreditar el cumplimiento de los requisitos formales requeridos para que se decrete la nulidad de una providencia, se RECHAZA la petición formulada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR la solicitud de nulidad formulada por el senor Luis Antonio Garzon Moreno al interior del tramite de revision adelantado por la Corte Constitucional que concluyo en la sentencia T-353 de 2019, de conformidad con lo expuesto en la parte motiva de esta decision.
  2. Segundo. Proceda la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion a informar al peticionario lo aqui resuelto.
  3. Tercero. Librense las comunicaciones correspondientes acompanando copia integral de este proveido.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
José Fernando Reyes Cuartas
Reporting justice
✓
Carlos Libardo Bernal Pulido
Dissenting opinion
Read dissent
✓
Alberto Rojas Ríos
Magistrado
Separate opinions — text available1
DissentCarlos Libardo Bernal Pulido
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.