JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 4, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez

✓Claimant Sabas Eduardo Pretelt De La Vega

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Improcedencia por falta de carga argumentativa
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia SU.297/15.

El accionante considera que la Sala Plena de la Corporación vulneró su derecho al debido proceso, puesto que, contrario a lo señalado en el fallo de revisión, sí explicó en su escrito de amparo los yerros en los que incurrió la Sala de Casación Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia y, también acreditó que dichas irregularidades fueron puestas de presente dentro del trámite judicial cuestionado.

La Corte decidió DENEGAR la nulidad impetrada, porque no se satisfizo el requisito formal de carga argumentativa.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. DENEGAR la solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia SU-297 de 2015 presentada por el ciudadano Sabas Eduardo Pretelt de la Vega.
  2. SEGUNDO. ADVERTIR al peticionario que contra esta decisión no procede ningún recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.