JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 21, 2019

A- de 2019

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo

✓Claimant Juan Climaco Rios Ramirez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Cumplimiento Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Abstenerse de asumir competencia para verificar cumplimiento
Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela
  • Corresponde al juez de primera instancia
Solicitud De Cumplimiento De Sentencia De Tutela E Incidente De Desacato
  • Competencia excepcional de la Corte Constitucional
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de apertura de incidente de desacato de la Sentencia T-291/17.

El peticionario argumentó el presunto incumplimiento de Colpensiones frente a las órdenes dictadas en el fallo de la referencia.

Teniendo en cuenta que el juzgado de instancia informó a la Sala que el actor pidió a ese despacho la apertura del incidente de desacato y que la entidad reconoció la prestación y su retroactivo, la Corte se ABSTUVO de tramitar el incidente formulado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. ABSTENERSE de tramitar la solicitud de apertura de incidente de desacato de la sentencia T-291 de 2017, presentada por el señor Juan Clímaco Ríos Ramírez.
  2. 7.
  3. SEGUNDO. INFORMAR al señor Juan Clímaco Ríos Ramírez de esta decisión, por intermedio del Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de El Águila.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.