A- de 2019
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice José Fernando Reyes Cuartas
✓Claimant Uariv
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Negar por cuanto no existe una razón objetiva de duda, sino inconformidad y deseo de reabrir el debate jurídico
- Procedencia excepcional
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de aclaración y/o adición de la Sentencia T-333/19, formulada por la UARIV.
Luego de analizar la petición elevada por la entidad concluyó la Corte que la misma resulta improcedente, en tanto en el fallo de la referencia están claras, no solo la orden contenida en su parte resolutiva, sino también las consideraciones tenidas en cuenta para conceder la protección a la accionante.
Se DENIEGA,
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. NEGAR la solicitud de aclaracion y/o adicion de la sentencia T-333 de 2019 formulada por la Unidad Administrativa para la Atencion y Reparacion Integral a las victimas (UARIV).
- Segundo. COMUNIQUESE la presente providencia a la peticionaria, con la advertencia que contra la misma no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.