A- de 2015
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio
✓Claimant Procurador General De La Nacion
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- No pertinencia por falta de correspondencia entre el hecho invocado por el recusante y el supuesto fáctico para que se configure la causal alegada
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Con el presente auto se declara que no es pertinente la recusación formulada por el Procurador General de la Nación en contra del Magistrado Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva, para que se separe del análisis adelantado por la Corte en la demanda de la referencia, por consiguiente, la Corte precisa que no hay lugar a la apertura del trámite incidental.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional en ejercicio de sus facultades constitucionales y legales,
- RESUELVE:
- Declarar que NO ES PERTINENTE la recusacion formulada por el Procurador General de la Nacion en contra del Magistrado Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.