JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 7, 2024

A- de 2024

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Paola Andrea Meneses Mosquera

✓Claimant Andres

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Improcedencia de aclaración
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia T-581/23.

El peticionario argumentó que la Sala de Revisión debe aclarar que omitió conceder el amparo de manera transitoria, debido a que, en su criterio, el actor cuenta con un término perentorio de cuatro meses contabilizados a partir de la fecha de emisión del fallo de tutela, para acudir a la jurisdicción ordinaria laboral, so pena de cesar los efectos de la decisión.

Se RECHAZÓ la anterior pretensión por no cumplir con el requisito de carga argumentativa necesaria para tales efectos.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR la solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia T-581 de 2023 presentada por Andrés, representante legal de la sociedad Servicios Ambientales, por las razones expuestas en esta providencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaría General, COMUNICAR a las partes del proceso de tutela la decisión adoptada en esta providencia, advirtiendo que contra esta decisión no procede ningún recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.