A- de 2019
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
✓Claimant Albeiro Fernandez Ochoa
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Requisitos formales de procedencia
- Rechazar por falta de legitimación
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia SU.140/19.
El peticionario argumentó como causales, el desconocimiento del precedente constitucional y la omisión de análisis de asuntos de relevancia constitucional que hubieran podido incidir en la decisión final.
Luego de verificar que el recurrente carece de legitimación en la causa por activa, la Corte decidió RECHAZAR la nulidad invocada.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR la solicitud de nulidad presentada por el señor Albeiro Fernández Ochoa, contra la sentencia SU-140 de 2019, proferida el veintiocho (28) de marzo de dos mil diecinueve (2019) por la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional, por carecer de legitimación en la causa por activa.
- SEGUNDO. Contra este pronunciamiento no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.