JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 24, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓Claimant Sala De Seguimiento

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Seguimiento Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional En Materia De Desplazamiento Forzado
  • Ordenar a la Directora General de la Agencia Nacional de Defensa Jurídica del Estado y al Director General de la Unidad Administrativa Especial para la Atención y Repara
  • Petición elevada por la Agencia Nacional de Defensa Jurídica del Estado y la Unidad para las Víctimas
Desplazamiento Forzado
  • Estado de cosas inconstitucional declarado en sentencia T-025/04
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordena a la Agencia Nacional de Defensa Jurídica para el Estado y a la Unidad Administrativa Especial para la Atención y Reparación Integral a las Víctimas, que presenten el plan de trabajo requerido a través del Auto 224/16, actualizado de acuerdo con los análisis y disposiciones contenidas en el Auto 373/16.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, el suscrito Magistrado Presidente,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. ORDENAR, a traves de la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, a la Directora General de la Agencia Nacional de Defensa Juridica del Estado y al Director General de la Unidad Administrativa Especial para la Atencion y Reparacion Integral a las Victimas, que presenten el plan de trabajo requerido a traves del 224 de 2016, actualizado de acuerdo con los analisis y disposiciones contenidos en el auto 373 de 2016, dentro de los ocho (8) dias siguientes a la comunicacion del presente auto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva
Reporting justice
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.