A- de 2015
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva
✓Claimant Jacqueline Rangel Pereira·Respondent Cnsc Y Otro
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Reiteración de Jurisprudencia
- Dirime conflictos de competencia entre distintas jurisdicciones
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Conflicto de competencia suscitado entre el Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Norte de Santander, Sala Disciplinaria y el Tribunal Superior de Cúcuta, Sala Penal.
Al tenor de lo establecido en el Auto 278/15 resuelve la Sala Plena la presente controversia, remitiendo el expediente al precitado Consejo Seccional para que de manera inmediata tramite y decida de fondo el amparo presentado.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (3 points)
- Primero. DEJAR SIN EFECTO el Acta de Sala Extraordinaria Ndeg67 del 2 de julio de 2015, emitido por el Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Norte de Santander, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria en la accion de tutela de Jacqueline Rangel Pereira en contra de Comision Nacional del Servicio Civil y de la Universidad de la Sabana.
- Segundo. REMITIR el expediente ICC-2269 al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Norte de Santander, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria, para que de manera inmediata tramite y decida de fondo el amparo presentado.
- Tercero. Por la Secretaria General de la Corte, COMUNICAR al Tribunal Superior de Distrito Judicial de Cucuta - Sala Penal la decision adoptada en esta providencia.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.