A- de 2015
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio
✓Claimant Representante Legal De Porvernir S.A.
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Requisitos formales y materiales de procedencia
- Rechazar por extemporánea
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-273/15- El representante de Porvenir S.A. consideró que con el precitado fallo se violó el derecho al debido proceso de la entidad, porque la decisión de primera instancia se profirió sin que le fuera notificado el auto admisorio de la acción de tutela.
La Sala encuentra que la anterior petición fue presentada de manera extemporánea y por ello, decide RECHAZARLA.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR, por extemporaneidad, la solicitud de nulidad presentada en contra de la sentencia T-273 de 2015.
- Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.