JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 30, 2022

A- de 2022

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo

✓Claimant Bernardo Hoyos Montoya·Respondent Tribunal Superior De Barranquilla

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

The case-law reporter has not yet indexed topics for this decision. The summary below describes what it is about.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto la Sala Plena de la Corporación dispuso SUSPENDER los términos del proceso de la referencia por un lapso de tres meses, contados a partir del momento en que se allegan todas las pruebas decretadas por el magistrado sustanciador, mediante auto del 2 de marzo del 2022.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (21 points)
  1. Único-. SUSPENDER los términos del proceso T-8.301.427 por tres (3) meses, contados a partir del momento en que se alleguen a esta corporación todas las pruebas decretadas por el magistrado sustanciador mediante auto del 02 de marzo de 2022.
  2. Comuníquese y cúmplase,
  3. CRISTINA PARDO SCHLESINGER
  4. Presidenta
  5. DIANA FAJARDO RIVERA
  6. Magistrada
  7. JORGE ENRIQUE IBÁÑEZ NAJAR
  8. Magistrado
  9. ALEJANDRO LINARES CANTILLO
  10. Magistrado
  11. ANTONIO JOSÉ LIZARAZO OCAMPO
  12. Magistrado
  13. PAOLA ANDREA MENESES MOSQUERA
  14. Magistrada
  15. GLORIA STELLA ORTIZ DELGADO
  16. Magistrada
  17. JOSÉ FERNANDO REYES CUARTAS
  18. Magistrado
  19. KARENA CASELLES HERNÁNDEZ
  20. Magistrada (E)
  21. MARTHA VICTORIA SÁCHICA MÉNDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela