JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 3, 2020

A- de 2020

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo

✓Claimant Gabriel Banguer Hurtado

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Corrección De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Corrección de errores por omisión, cambio o alteración de palabras en cualquier tiempo, de oficio o a solicitud de parte
Solicitud De Correccion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Rechazar por improcedente y falta de legitimación del solicitante
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de corrección de la Sentencia C-568/16.

Por no cumplir los requisitos de procedencia se RECHAZA la solicitud formulada.

Así mismo, la Corte decide no realizar la corrección de oficio, por no advertir error aritmético, una omisión o modificación de palabras en el numeral segundo de la parte resolutiva del precitado fallo.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR la solicitud de correccion presentada por el senor Gabriel Banguera Hurtado.
  2. Segundo. Por intermedio de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, COMUNICAR la presente providencia al peticionario.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.