A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo
✓Claimant Manuel Arnulfo Ladino
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Se rechaza por cuanto es improcedente cualquier recurso contra un auto de la Sala Plena que resuelve una solicitud de nulidad
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de nulidad del Auto 236/12, mediante el cual se rechazó, por extemporánea, una solicitud de nulidad presentada contra la Sentencia T-611/11.
Por resultar improcedente cualquier recurso contra un auto de la Sala Plena de la Corporación que resuelva una solicitud de nulidad, se RECHAZA de plano la petición formulada.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. Rechazar la solicitud de nulidad procesal del auto 236 de 2012, mediante el cual se declaró improcedente la solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-611 de 2011.
- SEGUNDO. Advertir que contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.