JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 7, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Rubiel Adolfo Berrio Medina

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Rechaza Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Se confirma auto que rechaza demanda por incumplimiento de requisitos de claridad, certeza, especificidad, pertinencia y suficiencia
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica interpuesto contra el auto proferido por el Magistrado Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo para rechazar la demanda de la referencia, por considerar que con el escrito de corrección no se subsanaron los defectos advertidos en el auto de inadmisión.

Al encontrar que le asistía razón al Magistrado Sustanciador, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió confirmar el auto recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR en todas sus partes el auto del 16 de septiembre de 2015, proferido por el Magistrado Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo en el proceso D-10922, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Rubiel Adolfo Medina Berrio contra los articulos 242 -parcial- de la Ley 906 de 2004 "[p]or la cual se expide el Codigo de Procedimiento Penal." y 402 -parcial- de la Ley 1407 de 2010, "[p]or la cual se expide el Codigo Penal Militar.".
  2. SEGUNDO. A traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte, comuniquese el contenido de esta decision al recurrente, indicandole que contra esta no procede recurso alguno.
  3. TERCERO. Archivese el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.