JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 21, 2019

A- de 2019

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez

✓Claimant Felix Hoyos Lemus

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Rechaza Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Incumplimiento de requisitos mínimos para la admisión
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica.

El rechazo de la demanda se dio porque el actor no logró satisfacer adecuadamente la carga de superar las falencias indicadas en el auto de inadmisión.

La Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió CONFIRMAR en su integridad la providencia cuestionada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR en su integridad el Auto del 24 de julio de 2019, proferido por la Magistrada Sustanciadora Diana Fajardo Rivera, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda de inconstitucionalidad radicada bajo el numero D-13291.
  2. Segundo. A traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte, comuniquese el contenido de la decision al demandante, indicandole que contra esta no procede recurso alguno.
  3. Tercero. Ejecutoriada esta decision, archivese el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.