JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 16, 2019

A- de 2019

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Libardo Bernal Pulido

✓Claimant Sala De Revision

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Incidente De Desacato
  • Control horizontal cuando no existe superior jerárquico
Inhibicion De La Corte Constitucional
  • Incompetencia para resolver el grado de consulta de la sanción por desacato
Consulta En Incidente De Desacato
  • Resolución por el superior funcional
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto la Sala Primera de Revisión de la Corte Constitucional se INHIBE, por falta de competencia, de resolver el grado de consulta respecto de la sanción de desacato contenida en el Auto 300 de 2019.

Así mismo, dispone devolver el expediente del respectivo incidente a la Sala Séptima de Revisión, para los fines que resulten pertinentes.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. INHIBIRSE para resolver el grado de consulta respecto de la sancion por desacato contenida en el Auto No. 300 del 5 de junio de 2019, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  2. Segundo. DEVOLVER el expediente de incidente de desacato respectivo a la Sala Septima de Revision de la Corte Constitucional, para los fines que resulten pertinentes.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
DissentCarlos Libardo Bernal PulidoDissentDiana Constanza Fajardo Rivera
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.