A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Aquiles Arrieta Gómez
✓Claimant Floresmiro Suarez Leon
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Se confirma rechazo por cuanto la Corte carece de competencia para conocer de la demanda de inconstitucionalidad presentada
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto contra el auto que ordenó rechazar la demanda de la referencia.
La Sala Plena decide CONFIRMAR en todas sus parte el auto recurrido, por estar de acuerdo con el ponente respecto a la falta de competencia de la Corporación para conocer demandas de inconstitucionalidad contra actos administrativos como el impugnado en la presente ocasión.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. CONFIRMAR en todas sus partes el Auto del diez (10) de agosto de dos mil dieciseis (2016), proferido por el despacho del Magistrado Ponente en el proceso D-11578, doctor Jorge Ivan Palacio Palacio, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Floresmiro Suarez Leon contra la Resolucion 0600120150070670 proferida por la Unidad de Atencion y Reparacion Integral a las Victimas.
- Segundo. ARCHIVESE el expediente.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.