JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 28, 2020

A- de 2020

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar

✓Claimant De Oficio

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Correccion De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Aplicación del artículo 286 del Código General del Proceso
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se CORRIGE de oficio los numerales primero, segundo y tercero de la parte resolutiva de la Sentencia T-315/20, en el sentido de indicar que el nombre correcto de la accionante es Ángela María Cruz Libreros y no, Angélica María Cruz Libreros como erradamente se registró en dichos acápites.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. CORREGIR de oficio, en los numerales primero,
  2. segundo. y
  3. tercero. de la parte resolutiva de la Sentencia T-315 de 2020, el nombre de la accionante el cual quedará así: "Ángela María Cruz Libreros".
  4. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Relatoría de la Corte Constitucional asegurar que sea corregido el texto de la Sentencia T-315 de 2020 al que accede el público.
  5. Tercero. NOTIFICAR esta decisión por aviso, de conformidad con el artículo 286 del Código General del Proceso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.